Page 1 of 1
Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 7:28 pm
by Jokingjoe
OKAY Nymph..this is the 2nd time this age you've dropped networth to declare on me. (Still a silly rule, Kaz) I don't like downhitting--seems too easy. However, in your case, I may have to adopt Seska's policy's of equal style of lameness when dealing with downhitters.
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 9:41 pm
by Kaz
The 'Networth' check is there to remove confusion when people look at the scrolls, see a kingdom that has a greater rank, but cannot attack them because the land (something they couldn't see without a scout) was too low.
There were initially a lot of erroneous bug reports, so I tried swapping the ranks from networth to land allowing people to have an idea regarding whether a kingdom could be attacked or not. People didn't like that so much, so we reverted back to ranks based on networth, and I gave in and added greater networth as declaration option.
In the end, no matter what I do there is always going to be a way to get around the checks. They are not a fix-all against downhitting, as sandbagging shows, but that said, you can only sandbag your networth so far. But they at least help out somewhat.
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 11:34 pm
by Nymphsong
I agree with Joe...honestly...I think that it should be 90% land and only that. Reason, it is too easy for me to ds my troops declare, hire more troops and as a 43k acre realm overwhelm a 27k acre realm.
That said, I will play within the limits of the game to try and win even if it is Lawful Evil.
You could simply request that I stop (but you have not requested that yet.)
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:09 pm
by Kaz
While I can see what you're saying, I did after all originally design the system to be land only, but I'm not going to remove the networth check, simply because I added it in response to a lot of confusion that the previous version created.
I'm open to other ideas to reduce the ability to bypass the system though.
One idea would be to lock down the ability to declare war without at least 50% of your troop cap filled e.g. "My Lord, perhaps we should hire more troops before we declare war".
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:50 pm
by Nymphsong
I like that idea.
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 5:01 am
by Jokingjoe
I like that, too. Solid idea, Kaz.
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:52 pm
by Dreck
Lol joe u are too much I'll be dammed if I gotta read all the stuff uve posted to catch up I retire lol jk hope to play with u soon
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:26 pm
by Jokingjoe
Come play Dreck

Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:07 pm
by Dreck
i will once I find a home I'm on my photo me right now
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:28 pm
by Jokingjoe
:p Nice downhit Nymph
01st Dec 2014 START OF WAR DETECTED
01st Dec 2014 - 21:17UTC 30008 3,468,494 102,470 100% 10006 3,866,761 76,308 99%
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 11:38 pm
by Nymphsong
I bow to your superior play.
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:13 am
by Tara
Nymphsong wrote:I bow to your superior play.
That sounded a little sarcastic.
Re: Goldenrule Effects
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 5:09 pm
by Jokingjoe
certainly--Nymph has always had superior play.