The bill is too much of a compromise to be a good bill. But it does mean a shift in the way peolpe think of healthcare. I am sure that given time, no one in America will want to go back to the way it was, except maybe the most rabid of Republicans.Sky's White House commentator Jon-Christopher Bua wrote:Despite its flaws this historic piece of healthcare legislation is the first step in reforming a broken system that has failed to cover over 30 million Americans.
Every decision which is made in this way supports my call for a complete overhaul of the whole American political system, but I'll refrain from emphasising that too much lest we deviate from the topic at hand.
Grunt (and other opponents of the bill), as the decision is made now, just wait and see what happens. I think a lot of amendments and revamps are required to make this system work, but then again, isn't that always the case with new systems?
The system you had was one of the worst in all (semi-)civilised countries. If anything, this is better. And doctors threatening to quit don't know what they're saying. What would they do for a living then? Sure, they can't rip off their patients anymore like they used to, but it's not like they're going to be poor from now on.
Over here, people become doctors because they see it as a calling. Most people who study to become a doctor, know that they want to do so as of a very early age (I know some who said they wanted to be a doctor at age 4 (!) and are now wrapping up their last years at the uni). It seems that in the private clinics in the USA it's nothing more than a quick way to get ridiculously rich.